Silverstack knifes pro#
Silverstack knifes software#
Silverstack knifes Offline#

KeyFlow Pro 2’s pricing model is really attractive at $50 on the Mac App Store.

Generate proxy footage so you can take low res version of video files on the road!.

It can open FCP X libraries directly too.

For the Adobe folks, it supports Premiere exports.

Drag and drop from KeyFlow to FCP X and back.

It’s received a lot of critical acclaim too. Clean and modern interface, indicates active product development.It definitely seems like a more-mature sibling of Kyno, and is particularly Mac-centric supporting popular NLE exports.

Silverstack knifes software#

There is no subscription, but after 1 year you have you pay for another year of software updates. The advanced version will also export to Excel, etc. Kyno doesn’t lock its metadata inside itself offers FCP X and Premiere exports. In that sense, Kyno could be a formidable replacement replacement your current offloading workflow. Kyno is in active development and bundles many features that are helpful for preparing an edit like transcoding, batch timecode changes, and so on. The UI is a refreshing change from Adobe Bridge, and is PC/Mac compatible. It writes all its metadata to JSON files hidden in the same folder as the original asset. Kyno is a really beautiful metadata tagging program.

Your use case may vary, so the best programs of both types will still be considered below. The ability to browse and tag footage that is offline/in the cloud makes library-based management exactly what I’m looking for. It is perfect for working with local drives, NAS drives, and even tagging footage while it’s still on SD cards.Īs a cloud storage user and road warrior, I however want to have the ability to find footage when it’s not on my local machine and present it to stakeholders. In my mind, file-based management seems best suited for preparing an edit. No concept of “global searches” because the application does not itself store metadata.Sidecar content can also be searched via regular file searches.Metadata is easier to share/backup (plaintext files are compatible on all systems).Use the catalog to download just the files you want, to save on bandwidth costs.

Silverstack knifes Offline#

Tag/search metadata even when footage is offline.Here are the pros/cons of the two approaches. … there is not really a concept of “inside” or “outside”… which also means there is no global search of all content… Pros/Cons Kyno, a file browser-based program, articulates this difference really well in their FAQ. file browser-based solutions that write metadata next to the originals as text files. There are two approaches when tagging footage: library-based managers that tag reference footage in a catalog vs. Is there a solution worth investing in which still leaves one’s workflow open and flexible? Two Metadata Philosophies We’re still in the early days of metadata for media, so I think these standards are only just beginning to emerge.

The more data you put in, the more expensive and painful it becomes to transition. If you can’t move your metadata freely in and out of a product, you are tying yourself to it. The more effort you put into a MAM (media asset manager), the more value it has to your organization-and the more dependent you become upon it. Great words from a 2012 discussion about media managment on Creative Cow: How about all files that need audio synced up? Coming right up. to quickly pull up footage based on smart bins. With over twenty years of Indian classical music concert footage, I’ve always dreamt of tagging each file by raga, tala, artist, audio quality, etc.